Get Updates By Email
RSS FEEDSThe postings on this site were created for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.
Recent Posts
- DOL Seeks to End 2020 With Possible Clarity on Tip Pooling
- Commissioned Employees? DOL Withdraws No-Retail and May-Be-Retail Lists for Certain Industries
- New DOL Rule on Joint Employer
- Michigan Takes Action to Raise Overtime Pay Threshold
- Department of Labor Increases the Annual Salary Threshold for “White Collar” Exemptions
- Overtime Pay Calculations under Review: DOL Issues Proposed Update to Regular Rate of Pay Regulations
- DOL Reveals New Proposed Overtime Salary Requirement
- Get Ready to Ring in the New Year with More Employment Law Changes
- Michigan Revises Paid Sick Leave Mandate and Minimum Wage Increases
- California Supreme Court Rejects De Minimis Exception and Requires Employers to Compensate Employees for Every Second of “Off-the-Clock” Work
Topics
- Home Health Care
- Interns and Internships
- Attorney Fees
- California
- Exemption
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Exempt Status
- Salary
- Nondiscretionary Bonus
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- White Collar
- Classification
- Misclassification
- Overtime
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Telecommuting
- Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Independent Contractor
- Discrimination
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA)
- Accommodation
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
- Michigan
- Minimum Wage
Showing 1 post in Attorney Fees.
Fifth Circuit Turns the Table on Department of Labor, Sanctions Government for Bad Faith Conduct During Investigation and Subsequent Litigation
Sometimes the hunter becomes the hunted. That’s a lesson the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) recently learned. In an opinion dated July 2, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reprimanded the DOL for pursuing “poorly documented” and “legally dubious” claims. The Fifth Circuit found that the DOL had engaged in “uncivil and costly litigation tactics,” attempting to prevail by oppressively pursuing a very weak case. Ultimately, the court held that the DOL had “acted in bad faith” and ordered the district court to enter an award against the DOL for hundreds of thousands of dollars in attorneys’ fees. More
